On the Use of Cauchy Prior Distributions for Bayesian Logistic Regression

TL;DR

This paper investigates the conditions under which posterior means exist in Bayesian logistic regression with Cauchy priors, especially under separation, and introduces a Gibbs sampler for inference.

Contribution

It provides necessary and sufficient conditions for posterior mean existence with Cauchy priors and develops a Gibbs sampler for Bayesian logistic regression.

Findings

Posterior means may not exist under separation with Cauchy priors.

Gibbs sampler exhibits slow mixing with heavy-tailed priors.

Lighter-tailed priors improve sampling efficiency.

Abstract

In logistic regression, separation occurs when a linear combination of the predictors can perfectly classify part or all of the observations in the sample, and as a result, finite maximum likelihood estimates of the regression coefficients do not exist. Gelman et al. (2008) recommended independent Cauchy distributions as default priors for the regression coefficients in logistic regression, even in the case of separation, and reported posterior modes in their analyses. As the mean does not exist for the Cauchy prior, a natural question is whether the posterior means of the regression coefficients exist under separation. We prove theorems that provide necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of posterior means under independent Cauchy priors for the logit link and a general family of link functions, including the probit link. We also study the existence of posterior means under multivariate Cauchy priors. For full Bayesian inference, we develop a Gibbs sampler based on Polya-Gamma data augmentation to sample from the posterior distribution under independent Student-t priors including Cauchy priors, and provide a companion R package in the supplement. We demonstrate empirically that even when the posterior means of the regression coefficients exist under separation, the magnitude of the posterior samples for Cauchy priors may be unusually large, and the corresponding Gibbs sampler shows extremely slow mixing. While alternative algorithms such as the No-U-Turn Sampler in Stan can greatly improve mixing, in order to resolve the issue of extremely heavy tailed posteriors for Cauchy priors under separation, one would need to consider lighter tailed priors such as normal priors or Student-t priors with degrees of freedom larger than one.