Compensation of Nonlinear Torsion in Flexible Joint Robots: Comparison of Two Approaches
Michael Ruderman

TL;DR
This paper compares two methods for compensating nonlinear torsion with hysteresis in flexible joint robots, improving tracking accuracy under heavy loads by using only motor-side measurements.
Contribution
It introduces and compares two novel approaches for nonlinear torsion compensation in flexible joint robots with hysteresis, using only motor-side signals.
Findings
Both methods effectively reduce torsion-induced errors.
The inverse hysteresis approach improves tracking accuracy.
Numerical example demonstrates practical applicability.
Abstract
Flexible joint robots, in particularly those which are equipped with harmonic-drive gears, can feature elasticities with hysteresis. Under heavy loads and large joint torques the hysteresis lost motion can lead to significant errors of tracking and positioning of the robotic links. In this paper, two approaches for compensating the nonlinear joint torsion with hysteresis are described and compared with each other. Both methods assume the measured signals available only on the motor side of joint transmissions. The first approach assumes a rigid-link manipulator model and transforms the desired link trajectory into that of the motor drives by using the inverse dynamics and inverse hysteresis map. The second approach relies on the modeling of motor drives and inverse hysteresis and uses the generalized momenta when predicting the joint torsion. Both methods are discussed in details along…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
