Practical Selection of SVM Supervised Parameters with Different Feature Representations for Vowel Recognition
Rimah Amami, Dorra Ben Ayed, Noureddine Ellouze

TL;DR
This paper investigates how different SVM parameters and feature representations like MFCC and PLP affect vowel recognition performance on the TIMIT corpus, aiming to optimize classifier generalization.
Contribution
It provides a practical analysis of parameter selection and feature impact on SVM performance for vowel recognition tasks.
Findings
Optimal kernel and parameters improve recognition accuracy
Feature choice significantly affects SVM performance
Parameter sensitivity varies with feature representation
Abstract
It is known that the classification performance of Support Vector Machine (SVM) can be conveniently affected by the different parameters of the kernel tricks and the regularization parameter, C. Thus, in this article, we propose a study in order to find the suitable kernel with which SVM may achieve good generalization performance as well as the parameters to use. We need to analyze the behavior of the SVM classifier when these parameters take very small or very large values. The study is conducted for a multi-class vowel recognition using the TIMIT corpus. Furthermore, for the experiments, we used different feature representations such as MFCC and PLP. Finally, a comparative study was done to point out the impact of the choice of the parameters, kernel trick and feature representations on the performance of the SVM classifier
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis · Speech and Audio Processing · Music and Audio Processing
MethodsSupport Vector Machine
