Meaning of temperature in different thermostatistical ensembles
Peter H\"anggi, Stefan Hilbert, J\"orn Dunkel

TL;DR
This paper explores the concept of temperature across different thermostatistical ensembles, clarifying the proper definitions and implications for thermodynamic laws, especially in non-equivalent ensembles and systems with discrete spectra.
Contribution
It clarifies the correct entropy definition in microcanonical ensembles and discusses the implications for temperature and thermodynamic laws, resolving common confusions.
Findings
Volume entropy satisfies thermodynamic laws exactly
Negative absolute temperatures are not physically achievable
Microcanonical ensemble definitions impact thermodynamic consistency
Abstract
Depending on the exact experimental conditions, the thermodynamic properties of physical systems can be related to one or more thermostatistical ensembles. Here, we survey the notion of thermodynamic temperature in different statistical ensembles, focusing in particular on subtleties that arise when ensembles become non-equivalent. The 'mother' of all ensembles, the microcanonical ensemble, uses entropy and internal energy (the most fundamental, dynamically conserved quantity) to derive temperature as a secondary thermodynamic variable. Over the past century, some confusion has been caused by the fact that several competing microcanonical entropy definitions are used in the literature, most commonly the volume and surface entropies introduced by Gibbs. It can be proved, however, that only the volume entropy satisfies exactly the traditional form of the laws of thermodynamics for a broad…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
