Mapping and simulating systematics due to spatially-varying observing conditions in DES Science Verification data
B. Leistedt, H.V. Peiris, F. Elsner, A. Benoit-L\'evy, A. Amara, A. H., Bauer, M. R. Becker, C. Bonnett, C. Bruderer, M. T. Busha, M. Carrasco Kind,, C. Chang, M. Crocce, L. N. da Costa, E. Gaztanaga, E. M. Huff, O. Lahav, A., Palmese, W.J. Percival, A. Refregier, A. J. Ross

TL;DR
This paper develops a framework to map and simulate spatially-varying observing conditions in galaxy surveys, demonstrating its application to DES data and its importance for future surveys like LSST.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel method to extract and project observing systematics onto the sky, enhancing analysis and simulation of survey data.
Findings
Spatial systematics are mainly due to seeing fluctuations.
The simulation reproduces observed galaxy density and redshift distributions.
Systematics are under control in current analyses.
Abstract
Spatially-varying depth and characteristics of observing conditions, such as seeing, airmass, or sky background, are major sources of systematic uncertainties in modern galaxy survey analyses, in particular in deep multi-epoch surveys. We present a framework to extract and project these sources of systematics onto the sky, and apply it to the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to map the observing conditions of the Science Verification (SV) data. The resulting distributions and maps of sources of systematics are used in several analyses of DES SV to perform detailed null tests with the data, and also to incorporate systematics in survey simulations. We illustrate the complementarity of these two approaches by comparing the SV data with the BCC-UFig, a synthetic sky catalogue generated by forward-modelling of the DES SV images. We analyse the BCC-UFig simulation to construct galaxy samples…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
