redMaGiC: Selecting Luminous Red Galaxies from the DES Science Verification Data
E. Rozo, E. S. Rykoff, A. Abate, C. Bonnett, M. Crocce, C. Davis, B., Hoyle, B. Leistedt, H.V. Peiris, R. H. Wechsler, T. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, M., Banerji, A. H. Bauer, A. Benoit-L\'evy, G. M. Bernstein, E. Bertin, D., Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, D. L. Burke, D. Capozzi

TL;DR
redMaGiC is an automated algorithm that efficiently selects luminous red galaxies with minimal photometric redshift uncertainties, suitable for large-scale structure studies, demonstrated on DES, SDSS, and Stripe 82 data.
Contribution
The paper introduces redMaGiC, a novel self-training algorithm for selecting luminous red galaxies with accurate photometric redshifts and minimal training requirements.
Findings
Achieves photometric redshift accuracy comparable to machine-learning methods.
Produces a galaxy sample with a median photoz bias of 0.005.
Demonstrates applicability across multiple survey datasets.
Abstract
We introduce redMaGiC, an automated algorithm for selecting Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs). The algorithm was specifically developed to minimize photometric redshift uncertainties in photometric large-scale structure studies. redMaGiC achieves this by self-training the color-cuts necessary to produce a luminosity-thresholded LRG sample of constant comoving density. We demonstrate that redMaGiC photozs are very nearly as accurate as the best machine-learning based methods, yet they require minimal spectroscopic training, do not suffer from extrapolation biases, and are very nearly Gaussian. We apply our algorithm to Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data to produce a redMaGiC catalog sampling the redshift range . Our fiducial sample has a comoving space density of , and a median photoz bias () and scatter…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
