Linking dust emission to fundamental properties in galaxies: The low-metallicity picture
A. R\'emy-Ruyer, S. C. Madden, F. Galliano, V. Lebouteiller, M. Baes,, G. J. Bendo, A. Boselli, L. Ciesla, D. Cormier, A. Cooray, L. Cortese, I. De, Looze, V. Doublier-Pritchard, M. Galametz, A. P. Jones, O. {\L}. Karczewski,, N. Lu, and L. Spinoglio

TL;DR
This study investigates how dust properties in galaxies vary with metallicity by analyzing infrared to submillimetre data from 109 galaxies, revealing links between dust characteristics, star formation, and chemical evolution.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of dust properties across a wide metallicity range using physically-motivated models, highlighting systematic uncertainties and the role of dust growth processes.
Findings
Dust SEDs are broader and peak at shorter wavelengths in low-metallicity galaxies.
Dust mass estimates vary significantly with modeling assumptions.
Dust growth in the ISM is crucial for dust accumulation in metal-poor, high-SSFR galaxies.
Abstract
In this work, we aim at providing a consistent analysis of the dust properties from metal-poor to metal-rich environments by linking them to fundamental galactic parameters. We consider two samples of galaxies: the Dwarf Galaxy Survey (DGS) and KINGFISH, totalling 109 galaxies, spanning almost 2 dex in metallicity. We collect infrared (IR) to submillimetre (submm) data for both samples and present the complete data set for the DGS sample. We model the observed spectral energy distributions (SED) with a physically-motivated dust model to access the dust properties. Using a different SED model (modified blackbody), dust composition (amorphous carbon), or wavelength coverage at submm wavelengths results in differences in the dust mass estimate of a factor two to three, showing that this parameter is subject to non-negligible systematic modelling uncertainties. For eight galaxies in our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
