Replies to Comments on "Tetraquarks as Diquark-Antidiquark Bound Systems"
M. Monemzadeh, N. Tazimi, P. Sadeghi

TL;DR
This paper responds to critiques of a previous study on tetraquarks as diquark-antidiquark systems, clarifying misunderstandings and defending the original methodology and results.
Contribution
It provides a detailed rebuttal to criticisms, clarifying the original study's methodology and defending its conclusions on tetraquark structures.
Findings
Clarifies misunderstandings about the original study
Defends the accuracy of the original methodology
Reaffirms the validity of the original results
Abstract
The present paper is written in response to the critical comments of M.R. Hadizadeh on our original paper Tetraquarks as diquark-antidiquark bound systems [Phys. Lett. B 741, 124 (2015), arXiv:1505.07510]. We present our clarifications on his arguments against the accuracy of the procedure and results of the study. The arguments turn out to stem mainly from the critic's misunderstanding of the issues discussed in the original paper.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions · Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics · Quantum many-body systems
