Attenuation of super-soft X-ray sources by circumstellar material
Mikkel Nielsen, Marat Gilfanov

TL;DR
This study revisits the potential for circumstellar material to obscure super-soft X-ray sources, incorporating photo-ionisation effects, and finds that much higher mass-loss rates are needed for obscuration than previously thought, reducing its likelihood as the main cause of missing sources.
Contribution
It provides a self-consistent calculation of ionisation states in circumbinary material, challenging earlier estimates of obscuration feasibility for super-soft X-ray sources.
Findings
Higher mass-loss rates are required for obscuration than previously estimated.
Circumstellar obscuration alone is unlikely to explain the scarcity of observed super-soft X-ray sources.
Obscured sources would have distinct observational signatures from nebulae in low-density ISM.
Abstract
Recent studies have suggested the possibility of significantly obscuring super-soft X-ray sources in relatively modest amounts of local matter lost from the binaries themselves. If correct, then this would have explained the paucity of observed super-soft X-ray sources and would have significance for the search for single-degenerate type Ia supernova progenitors. We point out that earlier studies of circumbinary obscuration ignored photo-ionisations of the gas by the emission from the super-soft X-ray source. We revisit the problem using a full, self-consistent calculation of the ionisation state of the circumbinary material photo-ionised by the radiation of the central source. Our results show that the circumstellar mass-loss rates required for obcuration of super-soft X-ray sources is about an order of magnitude larger than those reported in earlier studies, for comparable model…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
