Importance of Fermi Surface Topology for In-Plane Resistivity Anisotropy in Hole- and Electron-Doped Ba(Fe$_{1-x}$TM$_{x}$)$_2$As$_2$ (TM=Cr, Mn and Co)
Tatsuya Kobayashi, Kiyohisa Tanaka, Shigeki Miyasaka, Setsuko Tajima

TL;DR
This study explores how the Fermi surface topology influences in-plane resistivity anisotropy in doped BaFe2As2, revealing electron-hole asymmetry and the impact of different dopants on resistivity behavior.
Contribution
It demonstrates the role of Fermi surface topology in resistivity anisotropy and highlights the electron-hole asymmetry in doped BaFe2As2 across different phases.
Findings
Cr doping effectively introduces hole carriers
Resistivity anisotropy changes sign with Cr doping
Resistivity anisotropy remains positive in the paramagnetic phase
Abstract
The in-plane anisotropy of resistivity has been investigated for Ba(FeTM)As (TM-Ba122, TMCr, Mn, and Co) where the substitution sites are the same but the doped carriers are different for different TM elements. The Hall coefficient measurements indicated that hole carriers are effectively doped by Cr substitution but not by Mn substitution. It has been found that the resistivity difference in the antiferromagnetic-orthorhombic (AFO) phase of Cr-Ba122 is initially positive but it turns to negative with increasing Cr content, whereas the positive monotonically increases with Mn substitution in Mn-Ba122. In the paramagnetic-tetragonal phase, is always positive, but it decreases with substitution in Cr-Ba122, in contrast to the electron-doped case. These results demonstrate that the resistivity…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
