Competing Effects of Social Balance and Influence
P. Singh, S. Sreenivasan, B. K. Szymanski, G. Korniss

TL;DR
This paper models social dynamics with three states, analyzing how external deradicalizing influence affects the stability and convergence of social opinions, revealing a critical threshold for consensus formation.
Contribution
It introduces a coupled three-state model combining social balance and external influence, identifying a critical external field strength that determines system behavior.
Findings
Existence of a critical external field $p_c$ separating different dynamical regimes.
Metastable states and saddle points occur when $p < p_c$.
Convergence time to consensus matches quasi-stationary distribution predictions.
Abstract
We study a three-state (leftist, rightist, centrist) model that couples the dynamics of social balance with an external deradicalizing field. The mean-field analysis shows that there exists a critical value of the external field such that for a weak external field (), the system exhibits a metastable fixed point and a saddle point in addition to a stable fixed point. However, if the strength of the external field is sufficiently large (), there is only one (stable) fixed point which corresponds to an all-centrist consensus state (absorbing state). In the weak-field regime, the convergence time to the absorbing state is evaluated using the quasi-stationary distribution and is found to be in agreement with the results obtained by numerical simulations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Complex Network Analysis Techniques
