Equivalent definitions of superstability in tame abstract elementary classes
Rami Grossberg, Sebastien Vasey

TL;DR
This paper proves the equivalence of multiple definitions of superstability in tame abstract elementary classes with a monster model, clarifying the concept's consistency and providing a unified framework for understanding superstability.
Contribution
It establishes the equivalence of various superstability notions in tame AECs with a monster model under stability assumptions, unifying previous disparate definitions.
Findings
No long splitting chains implies solvability.
Uniqueness of limit models implies no long splitting chains.
All definitions of superstability are equivalent in this context.
Abstract
In the context of abstract elementary classes (AECs) with a monster model, several possible definitions of superstability have appeared in the literature. Among them are no long splitting chains, uniqueness of limit models, and solvability. Under the assumption that the class is tame and stable, we show that (asymptotically) no long splitting chains implies solvability and uniqueness of limit models implies no long splitting chains. Using known implications, we can then conclude that all the previously-mentioned definitions (and more) are equivalent: Let be a tame AEC with a monster model. Assume that is stable in a proper class of cardinals. The following are equivalent: 1) For all high-enough , has no long splitting chains. 2) For all high-enough , there exists a good -frame on a skeleton of . 3) For all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
