A combined maximum-likelihood analysis of the high-energy astrophysical neutrino flux measured with IceCube
IceCube Collaboration: M. G. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J., Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers, M. Ahrens, D. Altmann, T. Anderson, M., Archinger, C. Arguelles, T. C. Arlen, J. Auffenberg, X. Bai, S. W. Barwick,, V. Baum, R. Bay, J. J. Beatty, J. Becker Tjus, K.-H. Becker

TL;DR
This paper combines six IceCube searches to analyze high-energy astrophysical neutrino flux, finding it well described by an unbroken power law with a spectral index of about -2.5, and providing insights into neutrino flavor composition.
Contribution
It presents a combined maximum-likelihood analysis of multiple IceCube datasets, offering the most precise measurement of the astrophysical neutrino spectrum to date.
Findings
The neutrino spectrum follows an unbroken power law with index -2.50±0.09.
An index of -2 is statistically disfavored at 3.8 sigma.
Electron neutrino fraction at Earth is approximately 0.18, rejecting pure electron neutrino sources.
Abstract
Evidence for an extraterrestrial flux of high-energy neutrinos has now been found in multiple searches with the IceCube detector. The first solid evidence was provided by a search for neutrino events with deposited energies TeV and interaction vertices inside the instrumented volume. Recent analyses suggest that the extraterrestrial flux extends to lower energies and is also visible with throughgoing, -induced tracks from the Northern hemisphere. Here, we combine the results from six different IceCube searches for astrophysical neutrinos in a maximum-likelihood analysis. The combined event sample features high-statistics samples of shower-like and track-like events. The data are fit in up to three observables: energy, zenith angle and event topology. Assuming the astrophysical neutrino flux to be isotropic and to consist of equal flavors at Earth, the all-flavor…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
