Contamination of early-type galaxy alignments to galaxy lensing-CMB lensing cross-correlation
Nora Elisa Chisari, Joanna Dunkley, Lance Miller, Rupert Allison, (Oxford)

TL;DR
This paper reevaluates the contamination of galaxy intrinsic alignments on galaxy lensing-CMB lensing cross-correlation, finding a moderate impact from red galaxies and significant uncertainty at higher redshifts, which affects cosmological measurements.
Contribution
It provides updated estimates of intrinsic alignment contamination using recent observational constraints, highlighting the uncertainties at higher redshifts and the potential for substantial contamination.
Findings
Red galaxy contamination is approximately 10% with 3% uncertainty.
Blue galaxies are consistent with being unaligned but could add up to 9.5% contamination.
At high redshift (z>1.2), contamination could reach up to 60% under extreme assumptions.
Abstract
Galaxy shapes are subject to distortions due to the tidal field of the Universe. The cross-correlation of galaxy lensing with the lensing of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) cannot easily be separated from the cross-correlation of galaxy intrinsic shapes with CMB lensing. Previous work suggested that the intrinsic alignment contamination can be of this cross-spectrum for the CFHT Stripe 82 (CS82) and Atacama Cosmology Telescope surveys. Here we re-examine these estimates using up-to-date observational constraints of intrinsic alignments at a redshift more similar to that of CS82 galaxies. We find a contamination of the cross-spectrum from red galaxies, with uncertainty due to uncertainties in the redshift distribution of source galaxies and the modelling of the spectral energy distribution. Blue galaxies are consistent with being unaligned,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
