Strengths of the resonances at 436, 479, 639, 661, and 1279 keV in the $^{22}$Ne(p,$\gamma$)$^{23}$Na reaction
Rosanna Depalo, Francesca Cavanna, Federico Ferraro, Alessandra, Slemer, Tariq Al-Abdullah, Shavkat Akhmadaliev, Michael Anders, Daniel, Bemmerer, Zolt\'an Elekes, Giovanni Mattei, Stefan Reinicke, Konrad Schmidt,, Carlo Scian, and Louis Wagner

TL;DR
This study measures the strengths of key resonances in the $^{22}$Ne(p,$ extgamma$)$^{23}$Na reaction, reducing uncertainties in the reaction rate crucial for stellar nucleosynthesis models.
Contribution
It provides new, more precise resonance strength measurements for five key resonances, including improved normalization and branching ratios, enhancing the accuracy of astrophysical reaction rates.
Findings
Resonance strengths at 436, 639, and 661 keV were determined with improved precision.
The 661 keV resonance was found to be less intense than previously reported.
Branching ratios for gamma decay were refined for three resonances.
Abstract
The Ne(p,)Na reaction is included in the neon-sodium cycle of hydrogen burning. A number of narrow resonances in the Gamow window dominates the thermonuclear reaction rate. Several resonance strengths are only poorly known. As a result, the Ne(p,)Na thermonuclear reaction rate is the most uncertain rate of the cycle. Here, a new experimental study of the strengths of the resonances at 436, 479, 639, 661, and 1279 keV proton beam energy is reported. The data have been obtained using a tantalum target implanted with Ne. The strengths of the resonances at 436, 639, and 661 keV have been determined with a relative approach, using the 479 and 1279 keV resonances for normalization. Subsequently, the ratio of resonance strengths of the 479 and 1279 keV resonances was determined, improving the precision of these two standards.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
