An efficient basis set representation for calculating electrons in molecules
Jeremiah R. Jones, Francois-Henry Rouet, Keith V. Lawler, Eugene, Vecharynski, Khaled Z. Ibrahim, Samuel Williams, Brant Abeln, Chao Yang,, Daniel J. Haxton, C. William McCurdy, Xiaoye S. Li, Thomas N. Rescigno

TL;DR
This paper introduces a scalable, accurate basis set method using sinc functions on a Cartesian grid for electronic structure calculations in molecules, achieving high precision with reduced computational complexity.
Contribution
It generalizes a previous method to provide a simple, accurate, and scalable basis set representation that simplifies Coulomb matrix calculations and improves computational efficiency.
Findings
Achieves 1 kcal/mol precision for valence energies
Reduces two-electron integral calculations to O(N log N) operations
Produces superior energies and properties compared to variational methods
Abstract
The method of McCurdy, Baertschy, and Rescigno, J. Phys. B, 37, R137 (2004) is generalized to obtain a straightforward, surprisingly accurate, and scalable numerical representation for calculating the electronic wave functions of molecules. It uses a basis set of product sinc functions arrayed on a Cartesian grid, and yields 1 kcal/mol precision for valence transition energies with a grid resolution of approximately 0.1 bohr. The Coulomb matrix elements are replaced with matrix elements obtained from the kinetic energy operator. A resolution-of-the-identity approximation renders the primitive one- and two-electron matrix elements diagonal; in other words, the Coulomb operator is local with respect to the grid indices. The calculation of contracted two-electron matrix elements among orbitals requires only O(N log(N)) multiplication operations, not O(N^4), where N is the number of basis…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
