Kepler's first view of O-star variability: K2 data of five O stars in Campaign 0 as a proof-of-concept for O-star asteroseismology
B. Buysschaert, C. Aerts, S. Bloemen, J. Debosscher, C. Neiner, M., Briquet, J. Vos, P. Papics, R. Manick, V. Schmid, H. Van Winkel, A. Tkachenko

TL;DR
This study uses Kepler K2 data to analyze variability in five O-type stars, demonstrating the potential for O-star asteroseismology despite short observation durations and limited data quality.
Contribution
First K2 observations of O stars showing diverse variability types, including rotational modulation and pulsations, and highlighting prospects for detailed O-star seismology with future campaigns.
Findings
Detected rotational modulation in two stars.
Identified a multiperiodic $eta$ Cep-type pulsator.
Confirmed variability causes with space photometry data.
Abstract
We present high-precision photometric light curves of five O-type stars observed with the refurbished {\it Kepler\/} satellite during its Campaign 0. For one of the stars, we also assembled high-resolution ground-based spectroscopy with the {\sc hermes} spectrograph attached to the 1.2-m Mercator telescope. The stars EPIC202060097 (O9.5V) and EPIC202060098 (O7V) exhibit monoperiodic variability due to rotational modulation with an amplitude of 5.6 mmag and 9.3 mmag and a rotation period of 2.63 d and 5.03 d, respectively. EPIC202060091 (O9V) and EPIC202060093 (O9V:pe) reveal variability at low frequency but the cause is unclear. EPIC202060092 (O9V:p) is discovered to be a spectroscopic binary with at least one multiperiodic Cep-type pulsator whose detected mode frequencies occur in the range d and have amplitudes between 0.8 and 2.0 mmag. Its pulsation…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
