A $1.75$ LP approximation for the Tree Augmentation Problem

TL;DR

This paper introduces a novel LP-relaxation and a 1.75-approximation algorithm for the Tree Augmentation Problem, improving the known approximation ratio and offering new insights into network design optimization.

Contribution

The paper presents a new LP-relaxation for TAP and an efficient algorithm achieving a 1.75 approximation ratio, surpassing previous bounds and advancing understanding of connectivity problems.

Findings

Achieves a 1.75-approximation for TAP.

Introduces a new LP-relaxation with better integrality gap.

Algorithm runs efficiently without solving the LP explicitly.

Abstract

In the Tree Augmentation Problem (TAP) the goal is to augment a tree $T$ by a minimum size edge set $F$ from a given edge set $E$ such that $T \cup F$ is $2$-edge-connected. The best approximation ratio known for TAP is $1.5$. In the more general Weighted TAP problem, $F$ should be of minimum weight. Weighted TAP admits several $2$-approximation algorithms w.r.t. to the standard cut LP-relaxation, but for all of them the performance ratio of $2$ is tight even for TAP. The problem is equivalent to the problem of covering a laminar set family. Laminar set families play an important role in the design of approximation algorithms for connectivity network design problems. In fact, Weighted TAP is the simplest connectivity network design problem for which a ratio better than $2$ is not known. Improving this "natural" ratio is a major open problem, which may have implications on many other network design problems. It seems that achieving this goal requires finding an LP-relaxation with integrality gap better than $2$, which is a long time open problem even for TAP. In this paper we introduce such an LP-relaxation and give an algorithm that computes a feasible solution for TAP of size at most $1.75$ times the optimal LP value. This gives some hope to break the ratio $2$ for the weighted case. Our algorithm computes some initial edge set by solving a partial system of constraints that form the integral edge-cover polytope, and then applies local search on $3$-leaf subtrees to exchange some of the edges and to add additional edges. Thus we do not need to solve the LP, and the algorithm runs roughly in time required to find a minimum weight edge-cover in a general graph.