Networks of digital humanities scholars: The informational and social uses and gratifications of Twitter
Anabel Quan-Haase, Kim Martin, Lori McCay-Peet

TL;DR
This study explores how digital humanities scholars use Twitter for both informational and social purposes, revealing complex, overlapping networks that reflect their professional and personal connections.
Contribution
It provides a nuanced analysis of scholars' Twitter use, emphasizing the multifaceted nature of invisible colleges and the importance of mixed methods in big data research.
Findings
Twitter functions as an informational and social tool for scholars.
Follow relationships reflect shared interests and social ties.
The invisible college on Twitter is complex and multifaceted.
Abstract
Big data research is currently split on whether and to what extent Twitter can be characterised as an informational or social network. We contribute to this line of inquiry through an investigation of digital humanities scholars' uses and gratifications of Twitter. We conducted a thematic analysis of 25 semistructured interview transcripts to learn about these scholars' professional use of Twitter. Our findings show that Twitter is considered a critical tool for informal communication within DH invisible colleges, functioning at varying levels as both an informational network (learning to 'Twitter' and maintaining awareness) and a social network (imagining audiences and engaging other digital humanists). We find that Twitter follow relationships reflect common academic interests and are closely tied to scholars' preexisting social ties and conference or event co-attendance. The concept…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
