How to check quantum mechanics independently (Reply to arXiv:1505.04293)
Yuri I. Ozhigov

TL;DR
This paper discusses the reasons behind the closed nature of quantum experimental data and explores the possibility of independently verifying quantum mechanics without relying on other humans or external data sources.
Contribution
It provides an explanation for why quantum experimental data remains inaccessible and addresses the feasibility of independent verification of quantum mechanics.
Findings
Quantum data is kept closed due to experimental and security reasons.
Independent verification of quantum mechanics faces significant practical and conceptual challenges.
The nature of quantum data differs fundamentally from biological data, affecting transparency.
Abstract
This is the reply to the paper of Andrei Khrennikov arXiv:1505.04293 in which he expresses dissatisfaction with that the rough data in quantum experiments is not easily available and compares it with the open rough data in genetics. I try to explain why quantum experiments rough data is closed and why it differs radically from the biological. I also tried to answer the more thorny issue: is it possible to check quantum mechanics independently of other humans, e.g. trusting nobody.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Biofield Effects and Biophysics · Origins and Evolution of Life
