Comments On "Multipath Matching Pursuit" by Kwon, Wang and Shim
Nazim Burak Karahanoglu, Hakan Erdogan

TL;DR
This paper critiques the originality and analysis of the multipath matching pursuit algorithm, highlighting overlooked prior work, inadequate comparisons, and theoretical gaps that could mislead readers.
Contribution
It clarifies the relation of MMP to existing algorithms and compares its performance with A*OMP, addressing gaps in prior analyses.
Findings
MMP is not a novel idea and lacks proper referencing.
MMP has not been compared to A*OMP.
Theoretical analysis of MMP ignores practical pruning strategies.
Abstract
Straightforward combination of tree search with matching pursuits, which was suggested in 2001 by Cotter and Rao, and then later developed by some other authors, has been revisited recently as multipath matching pursuit (MMP). In this comment, we would like to point out some major issues regarding this publication. First, the idea behind MMP is not novel, and the related literature has not been properly referenced. MMP has not been compared to closely related algorithms such as A* orthogonal matching pursuit (A*OMP). The theoretical analyses do ignore the pruning strategies applied by the authors in practice. All these issues have the potential to mislead the reader and lead to misinterpretation of the results. With this short paper, we intend to clarify the relation of MMP to existing literature in the area and compare its performance with A*OMP.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques · Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies · Target Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
