A re-evaluation of the central velocity-dispersion profile in NGC 6388
Nora L\"utzgendorf, Karl Gebhardt, Holger Baumgardt, Eva Noyola,, Nadine Neumayer, Markus Kissler-Patig, Tim de Zeeuw

TL;DR
This study re-evaluates the central velocity dispersion of NGC 6388 using simulations and observations, revealing biases in measurements and supporting the presence of an intermediate-mass black hole.
Contribution
It demonstrates that individual radial velocity measurements in crowded fields are biased and provides refined estimates of the black hole mass and mass-to-light ratio.
Findings
Simulated data show biases towards lower velocity dispersions in SINFONI measurements.
ARGUS data have larger uncertainties but no bias, with some variations within errors.
Revised Jeans modeling supports a black hole mass of approximately 2.8 x 10^4 solar masses.
Abstract
Recently, two independent groups found very different results when measuring the central velocity dispersion of the galactic globular cluster NGC 6388 with different methods. While L\"utzgendorf et al. (2011) found a rising profile and a high central velocity dispersion (23.3 km/s), measurements obtained by Lanzoni et al. (2013) showed a value 40% lower. The value of the central velocity dispersion has a serious impact on the mass and possible presence of an intermediate-mass black hole at the center of NGC 6388. We use a photometric catalog of NGC 6388 to create a simulated SINFONI and ARGUS dataset. The construction of the IFU data cube is done with different observing conditions reproducing the conditions reported for the original observations as closely as possible. In addition, we produce an N-body realization of a 10^6 M_SUN stellar cluster with the same photometric properties as…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
