Invariant Set Theory: Violating Measurement Independence without Fine Tuning, Conspiracy, Constraints on Free Will or Retrocausality
Tim Palmer

TL;DR
Invariant Set Theory proposes a deterministic, fractal-based model of the universe that explains quantum phenomena without fine tuning or conspiracy, suggesting a new approach to unifying gravity and quantum physics.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel invariant set framework that violates Bell inequalities without fine tuning or conspiracy, linking cosmology with quantum and gravitational physics.
Findings
Violates Bell inequalities via Measurement Independence violation
Invariant set has Cantor set structure and zero measure in Euclidean space
Quantum theory emerges as a limit of IS theory when p approaches infinity
Abstract
Invariant Set (IS) theory is a locally causal ontic theory of physics based on the Cosmological Invariant Set postulate that the universe can be considered a deterministic dynamical system evolving precisely on a (suitably constructed) fractal dynamically invariant set in 's state space. IS theory violates the Bell inequalities by violating Measurement Independence. Despite this, IS theory is not fine tuned, is not conspiratorial, does not constrain experimenter free will and does not invoke retrocausality. The reasons behind these claims are discussed in this paper. These arise from properties not found in conventional ontic models: the invariant set has zero measure in its Euclidean embedding space, has Cantor Set structure homeomorphic to the p-adic integers () and is non-computable. In particular, it is shown that the p-adic metric encapulates the physics of the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
