
TL;DR
This paper demonstrates how to transfer symmetry properties from a larger cardinal to a smaller one in superstable abstract elementary classes using towers, without extra set-theoretic assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a new application of towers to transfer symmetry from + to in superstable AECs, expanding the tools for analyzing model-theoretic properties.
Findings
Symmetry for non-+-splitting implies symmetry for non--splitting.
Uses towers to transfer symmetry without extra set-theoretic assumptions.
Applicable to superstable AECs with amalgamation and joint embedding.
Abstract
In this paper, we apply results of \cite{Va3} and use towers to transfer symmetry from down to in superstable abstract elementary classes without using extra set-theoretic assumptions or tameness. Theorem. Suppose is an abstract elementary class satisfying the amalgamation and joint embedding properties and that is both - and -superstable. If has symmetry for non--splitting, then has symmetry for non--splitting. This is a new application of towers which were introduced by Shelah and Villaveces \cite{ShVi} and later used by VanDieren \cite{Va1}, \cite{Va2} and Grossberg, VanDieren, and Villaveces \cite{GVV} to prove the uniqueness of limit models.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
