On the Angular Resolution of the AGILE gamma-ray imaging detector

TL;DR

This paper evaluates the angular resolution of the AGILE gamma-ray detector through simulations and in-flight data, comparing it with Fermi-LAT, and discusses implications for future gamma-ray missions.

Contribution

It provides a detailed analysis of AGILE's angular resolution across energies and compares it with Fermi-LAT, highlighting design differences and performance stability.

Findings

AGILE's angular resolution is about 4° at 100 MeV and 0.8° at 1 GeV.

The resolution remains stable across a large field of view.

AGILE and Fermi-LAT have similar resolution in the 100 MeV to a few GeV range.

Abstract

We present a study of the Angular Resolution of the AGILE gamma-ray imaging detector (GRID) that is operational in space since April 2007. The AGILE instrument is made of an array of 12 planes each equipped with a Tungsten converter and Silicon micros trip detectors and is sensitive in the energy range 50 MeV - 10 GeV. Among the space instruments devoted to gamma-ray astrophysics, AGILE uniquely exploits an analog readout system with dedicated electronics coupled with Silicon detectors. We show the results of Monte Carlo simulations carried out to reproduce the gamma-ray detection by the GRID, and we compare them to in-flight data. We use the Crab (pulsar + Nebula) system for discussion of real data performance, since its E^{-2} energy spectrum is representative of the majority of gamma-ray sources. For Crab-like spectrum sources, the GRID angular resolution (FWHM of ~4deg at 100 MeV; ~0.8deg at 1 GeV; ~0.9deg integrating the full energy band from 100 MeV to tens of GeV) is stable across a large field of view, being characterized by a flat response up to 30deg off-axis. A comparison of the angular resolution obtained by the two operational gamma-ray instruments, AGILE-GRID and Fermi-LAT, is interesting in view of future gamma-ray missions, that are currently under study. The two instruments exploit different detector configurations affecting the angular resolution: the former being optimized in the readout and track reconstruction especially in the low-energy band, the latter in terms of converter thickness and power consumption. We show that, despite these differences, the angular resolution of both instruments is very similar between 100 MeV and a few GeV.