Is Anyone Out There? Unpacking Q&A Hashtags on Twitter
Jeffrey M. Rzeszotarski, Emma S. Spiro, Jorge Nathan Matias, Andr\'es, Monroy-Hern\'andez, and Meredith Ringel Morris

TL;DR
This study examines how Twitter users utilize Q&A hashtags to seek information and reach broader audiences, revealing that most responses come from immediate followers rather than the wider hashtag community.
Contribution
It uncovers the actual response patterns to Q&A hashtags on Twitter, challenging assumptions about community engagement and informing social search system design.
Findings
Most replies to hashtagged questions come from immediate followers.
Users believe they reach a larger community than they actually do.
Implications for designing social search systems to better engage wider audiences.
Abstract
In addition to posting news and status updates, many Twitter users post questions that seek various types of subjective and objective information. These questions are often labeled with "Q&A" hashtags, such as #lazyweb or #twoogle. We surveyed Twitter users and found they employ these Q&A hashtags both as a topical signifier (this tweet needs an answer!) and to reach out to those beyond their immediate followers (a community of helpful tweeters who monitor the hashtag). However, our log analysis of thousands of hashtagged Q&A exchanges reveals that nearly all replies to hashtagged questions come from a user's immediate follower network, contradicting user's beliefs that they are tapping into a larger community by tagging their question tweets. This finding has implications for designing next-generation social search systems that reach and engage a wide audience of answerers.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
