Computers Can't Give Credit: How Automatic Attribution Falls Short in an Online Remixing Community
Andr\'es Monroy-Hern\'andez, Benjamin Mako Hill, Jazmin Gonzalez-Rivero, danah boyd

TL;DR
This study investigates how automatic attribution in online remixing communities affects user reactions, finding that human-given credit holds more social value than automated systems, with implications for platform design.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of automated versus manual attribution effects on user reactions in a large online remixing community.
Findings
Automatic attribution influences user reactions differently than manual credit.
Human-given credit carries more social significance than automated attribution.
Design implications for online communities and social media platforms are discussed.
Abstract
In this paper, we explore the role that attribution plays in shaping user reactions to content reuse, or remixing, in a large user-generated content community. We present two studies using data from the Scratch online community -- a social media platform where hundreds of thousands of young people share and remix animations and video games. First, we present a quantitative analysis that examines the effects of a technological design intervention introducing automated attribution of remixes on users' reactions to being remixed. We compare this analysis to a parallel examination of "manual" credit-giving. Second, we present a qualitative analysis of twelve in-depth, semi-structured, interviews with Scratch participants on the subject of remixing and attribution. Results from both studies suggest that automatic attribution done by technological systems (i.e., the listing of names of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
