APX-Hardness of Maximizing Nash Social Welfare with Indivisible Items
Euiwoong Lee

TL;DR
This paper proves that maximizing Nash social welfare with indivisible items is APX-hard, establishing the computational difficulty of finding approximate solutions despite existing constant factor approximations.
Contribution
It demonstrates the APX-hardness of the problem, complementing prior results that showed constant factor approximability.
Findings
The problem is APX-hard, indicating no polynomial-time approximation scheme exists unless P=NP.
Existing algorithms can achieve constant factor approximations, but optimal solutions are computationally hard.
The result clarifies the complexity landscape of fair division with indivisible items.
Abstract
We study the problem of allocating a set of indivisible items to agents with additive utilities to maximize the Nash social welfare. Cole and Gkatzelis recently proved that this problem admits a constant factor approximation. We complement their result by showing that this problem is APX-hard.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
