Prophet Secretary

TL;DR

This paper introduces Prophet Secretary, a problem combining prophet inequality and secretary problem concepts, and develops strategies that improve competitive ratios for online selling scenarios with random customer order.

Contribution

It presents new thresholds-based algorithms that asymptotically achieve a (1-1/e) competitive ratio, surpassing the classical 0.5 barrier, and establishes an upper bound of 0.75.

Findings

Using n thresholds approaches (1-1/e) ratio as n grows

No algorithm can surpass 0.75 ratio in this setting

Improves approximation guarantees for sequential posted pricing mechanisms

Abstract

Optimal stopping theory is a powerful tool for analyzing scenarios such as online auctions in which we generally require optimizing an objective function over the space of stopping rules for an allocation process under uncertainty. Perhaps the most classic problems of stopping theory are the prophet inequality problem and the secretary problem. The classical prophet inequality states that by choosing the same threshold OPT/2 for every step, one can achieve the tight competitive ratio of 0.5. On the other hand, for the basic secretary problem, the optimal strategy achieves the tight competitive ratio of 1/e. In this paper, we introduce Prophet Secretary, a natural combination of the prophet inequality and the secretary problems. An example motivation for our problem is as follows. Consider a seller that has an item to sell on the market to a set of arriving customers. The seller knows the types of customers that may be interested in the item and he has a price distribution for each type: the price offered by a customer of a type is anticipated to be drawn from the corresponding distribution. However, the customers arrive in a random order. Upon the arrival of a customer, the seller makes an irrevocable decision whether to sell the item at the offered price. We address the question of finding a strategy for selling the item at a high price. We show that by using a uniform threshold one cannot break the 0.5 barrier. However, we show that i) using n distinct non-adaptive thresholds one can obtain a competitive ratio that goes to (1-1/e) as n grows; and ii) no online algorithm can achieve a competitive ratio better than 0.75. Our results improve the (asymptotic) approximation guarantee of single-item sequential posted pricing mechanisms from 0.5 to (1-1/e) when the order of agents (customers) is chosen randomly.