Comparison results for derived Deligne-Mumford stacks
Mauro Porta

TL;DR
This paper compares two definitions of derived Deligne-Mumford stacks by To"en-Vezzosi and Lurie, clarifying their equivalence which is often assumed but not explicitly documented.
Contribution
It provides a precise comparison and clarification of the equivalence between the two existing frameworks for derived Deligne-Mumford stacks.
Findings
The two notions are essentially equivalent.
Clarifies the relationship between To"en-Vezzosi and Lurie's definitions.
Facilitates switching between the two frameworks in research.
Abstract
In this short note we write down a comparison between the notion of derived Deligne-Mumford stack in the sense of B. To\"en and G. Vezzosi [HAG-II] and the one introduced by J. Lurie in [DAG-V]. It is folklore that the two theories yield essentially the same objects, but it is difficult to locate in the literature a precise result, despite being sometimes useful to be able to switch between the two frameworks.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
