The Optimal Sample Complexity of PAC Learning
Steve Hanneke

TL;DR
This paper proves a tight upper bound on the number of samples needed for PAC learning in the realizable case, matching lower bounds and solving a longstanding open problem.
Contribution
It introduces a new upper bound on PAC sample complexity that aligns with known lower bounds, advancing theoretical understanding.
Findings
Established a tight upper bound on sample complexity for PAC learning
Matched the upper bound with known lower bounds up to constants
Solved a long-standing open problem in PAC learning theory
Abstract
This work establishes a new upper bound on the number of samples sufficient for PAC learning in the realizable case. The bound matches known lower bounds up to numerical constant factors. This solves a long-standing open problem on the sample complexity of PAC learning. The technique and analysis build on a recent breakthrough by Hans Simon.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Algorithms and Data Compression · semigroups and automata theory
