Microstructural Comparison of the Kinematics of Discrete and Continuum Dislocations Models
Stefan Sandfeld, Giacomo Po

TL;DR
This paper compares continuum and discrete dislocation models, developing a numerical tool for direct microstructural comparison, revealing that continuum models retain many important microstructural details.
Contribution
It introduces a numerical method to convert discrete dislocation data into continuum representations for direct comparison, highlighting microstructural similarities.
Findings
Continuum models capture key microstructural features.
The numerical tool enables direct comparison of DDD and CDD.
Continuum dislocation dynamics retain important microstructural details.
Abstract
The Continuum Dislocation Dynamics (CDD) theory and the Discrete Dislocation Dynamics (DDD) method are compared based on concise mathematical formulations of the coarse graining of discrete data. A numerical tool for converting from a discrete to a continuum representation of a given dislocation configuration is developed, which allows to directly compare both simulation approaches based on continuum quantities (e.g. scalar density, geometrically necessary densities, mean curvature). Investigating the evolution of selected dislocation configurations within analytically given velocity fields for both DDD and CDD reveals that CDD contains a surprising number of important microstructural details.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
