On the bend number of circular-arc graphs as edge intersection graphs of paths on a grid
L. Alc\'on, F. Bonomo, G. Dur\'an, M. Gutierrez, M. P. Mazzoleni, B., Ries, M. Valencia-Pabon

TL;DR
This paper investigates the bend number of circular-arc graphs in edge intersection models on grids, proving bounds and characterizing subclasses with forbidden subgraphs.
Contribution
It establishes that all circular-arc graphs are B3-EPG, identifies those not B2-EPG, and characterizes B1-EPR graphs via forbidden subgraphs, advancing understanding of graph representations.
Findings
Every circular-arc graph is B3-EPG.
Some circular-arc graphs are not B2-EPG.
Normal circular-arc graphs are B2-EPR.
Abstract
Golumbic, Lipshteyn and Stern \cite{Golumbic-epg} proved that every graph can be represented as the edge intersection graph of paths on a grid (EPG graph), i.e., one can associate with each vertex of the graph a nontrivial path on a rectangular grid such that two vertices are adjacent if and only if the corresponding paths share at least one edge of the grid. For a nonnegative integer , -EPG graphs are defined as EPG graphs admitting a model in which each path has at most bends. Circular-arc graphs are intersection graphs of open arcs of a circle. It is easy to see that every circular-arc graph is a -EPG graph, by embedding the circle into a rectangle of the grid. In this paper, we prove that every circular-arc graph is -EPG, and that there exist circular-arc graphs which are not -EPG. If we restrict ourselves to rectangular representations (i.e., the union of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · graph theory and CDMA systems · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
