Why Mathematics Works So Well
Noson S. Yanofsky

TL;DR
This paper explores the deep connection between mathematics and physics, arguing that the effectiveness of mathematics in describing physical laws is due to shared symmetries, making this relationship more understandable.
Contribution
It demonstrates that the symmetries defining physical laws are analogous to those defining mathematical facts, explaining the effectiveness of mathematics in physics.
Findings
Symmetries of physics are key to understanding physical laws.
Mathematical facts exhibit similar symmetries as physical laws.
Physical regularities are a subset of mathematical regularities.
Abstract
A major question in philosophy of science involves the unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in physics. Why should mathematics, created or discovered, with nothing empirical in mind be so perfectly suited to describe the laws of the physical universe? We review the well-known fact that the symmetries of the laws of physics are their defining properties. We show that there are similar symmetries of mathematical facts and that these symmetries are the defining properties of mathematics. By examining the symmetries of physics and mathematics, we show that the effectiveness is actually quite reasonable. In essence, we show that the regularities of physics are a subset of the regularities of mathematics.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Philosophy and History of Science · Science and Climate Studies
