Greedy Is an Almost Optimal Deque

TL;DR

This paper extends the geometric BST model to include insertions and deletions, analyzes the Greedy BST algorithm's performance on deque sequences, and provides bounds and implications for dynamic optimality.

Contribution

It introduces an extended BST model with insertions/deletions, proves performance bounds for Greedy BST on deque sequences, and offers new insights into its potential for dynamic optimality.

Findings

Greedy BST has a quasilinear upper bound on deque sequences.

Greedy BST can serve output-restricted deque sequences in linear time.

Access cost for most permutations is Omega(n log n).

Abstract

In this paper we extend the geometric binary search tree (BST) model of Demaine, Harmon, Iacono, Kane, and Patrascu (DHIKP) to accommodate for insertions and deletions. Within this extended model, we study the online Greedy BST algorithm introduced by DHIKP. Greedy BST is known to be equivalent to a maximally greedy (but inherently offline) algorithm introduced independently by Lucas in 1988 and Munro in 2000, conjectured to be dynamically optimal. With the application of forbidden-submatrix theory, we prove a quasilinear upper bound on the performance of Greedy BST on deque sequences. It has been conjectured (Tarjan, 1985) that splay trees (Sleator and Tarjan, 1983) can serve such sequences in linear time. Currently neither splay trees, nor other general-purpose BST algorithms are known to fulfill this requirement. As a special case, we show that Greedy BST can serve output-restricted deque sequences in linear time. A similar result is known for splay trees (Tarjan, 1985; Elmasry, 2004). As a further application of the insert-delete model, we give a simple proof that, given a set U of permutations of [n], the access cost of any BST algorithm is Omega(log |U| + n) on "most" of the permutations from U. In particular, this implies that the access cost for a random permutation of [n] is Omega(n log n) with high probability. Besides the splay tree noted before, Greedy BST has recently emerged as a plausible candidate for dynamic optimality. Compared to splay trees, much less effort has gone into analyzing Greedy BST. Our work is intended as a step towards a full understanding of Greedy BST, and we remark that forbidden-submatrix arguments seem particularly well suited for carrying out this program.