Stochastic Unrelatedness, Couplings, and Contextuality
Ehtibar Dzhafarov

TL;DR
This paper explores the concepts of stochastic unrelatedness and couplings, emphasizing their fundamental role in probability theory and the foundational understanding of stochastic independence and contextuality.
Contribution
It clarifies the distinction between stochastic unrelatedness and independence, highlighting the importance of couplings in the foundation of probability and contextuality theory.
Findings
Stochastic independence is a special case of stochastic dependence.
Stochastic unrelatedness occurs when variables have no joint distribution.
Couplings can impose joint distributions on unrelated variables in many ways.
Abstract
R. Duncan Luce once mentioned in a conversation that he did not consider Kolmogorov's probability theory well-constructed because it treats stochastic independence as a "numerical accident," while it should be treated as a fundamental relation, more basic than the assignment of numerical probabilities. I argue here that stochastic independence is indeed a "numerical accident," a special form of stochastic dependence between random variables (most broadly defined). The idea that it is fundamental may owe its attractiveness to the confusion of stochastic independence with stochastic unrelatedness, the situation when two or more random variables have no joint distribution, "have nothing to do with each other." Kolmogorov's probability theory cannot be consistently constructed without allowing for stochastic unrelatedness, in fact making it a default situation: any two random variables…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
