Realistic uncertainties on Hapke model parameters from photometric measurement
Frederic Schmidt, Jennifer Fernando

TL;DR
This paper uses an advanced Bayesian inversion method to analyze uncertainties in Hapke model parameters, revealing that some observed parameter relationships are artifacts of the retrieval process rather than natural phenomena.
Contribution
It introduces an expanded Bayesian inversion approach to assess uncertainties and biases in Hapke parameter retrievals, and identifies optimal geometric conditions for accurate photometric measurements.
Findings
Uncertainties in parameters follow the hockey stick relation due to parameter coupling.
Full BRDF data are less affected by retrieval artifacts.
Optimal geometric sampling conditions are identified for precise parameter estimation.
Abstract
Hapke proposed a convenient and widely used analytical model to describe the spectro-photometry of granular materials. Using a compilation of the published data, Hapke (2012, Icarus, 221, 1079-1083) recently studied the relationship of b and c for natural examples and proposed the hockey stick relation (excluding b>0.5 and c>0.5). For the moment, there is no theoretical explanation for this relationship. One goal of this article is to study a possible bias due to the retrieval method. We expand here an innovative Bayesian inversion method in order to study into detail the uncertainties of retrieved parameters. On Emission Phase Function (EPF) data, we demonstrate that the uncertainties of the retrieved parameters follow the same hockey stick relation, suggesting that this relation is due to the fact that b and c are coupled parameters in the Hapke model instead of a natural phenomena.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
