Measurement of higher cumulants of net-charge multiplicity distributions in Au$+$Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=7.7-200$ GeV
A. Adare, S. Afanasiev, C. Aidala, N.N. Ajitanand, Y. Akiba, R., Akimoto, H. Al-Bataineh, J. Alexander, H. Al-Ta'ani, A. Angerami, K. Aoki, N., Apadula, Y. Aramaki, H. Asano, E.C. Aschenauer, E.T. Atomssa, R. Averbeck,, T.C. Awes, B. Azmoun, V. Babintsev, M. Bai, G. Baksay

TL;DR
This study measures higher-order cumulants of net-charge distributions in gold-gold collisions across a range of energies to explore the QCD phase diagram and search for critical phenomena, finding no nonmonotonic behavior.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive measurement of net-charge cumulant ratios over a wide energy range, comparing results with theoretical models to inform the QCD phase diagram.
Findings
Cumulant ratios are well described by negative binomial distributions.
No nonmonotonic behavior observed in cumulant ratios across energies.
Results enable extraction of freeze-out parameters for QCD studies.
Abstract
We report the measurement of cumulants () of the net-charge distributions measured within pseudorapidity () in AuAu collisions at GeV with the PHENIX experiment at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. The ratios of cumulants (e.g. , ) of the net-charge distributions, which can be related to volume independent susceptibility ratios, are studied as a function of centrality and energy. These quantities are important to understand the quantum-chromodynamics phase diagram and possible existence of a critical end point. The measured values are very well described by expectation from negative binomial distributions. We do not observe any nonmonotonic behavior in the ratios of the cumulants as a function of collision energy. The measured values of and can be directly…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
