How well can Charge Transfer Inefficiency be corrected? A parameter sensitivity study for iterative correction
Holger Israel (ICC Durham, CEA Durham), Richard Massey (ICC Durham,, CfAI Durham), Thibaut Prod'homme (ESA/ESTEC), Mark Cropper (UCL, MSSL),, Oliver Cordes (AIfA Bonn), Jason Gow (CEI, Open University), Ralf Kohley, (ESA/ESAC), Ole Marggraf (AIfA Bonn), Sami Niemi (UCL, MSSL)

TL;DR
This study evaluates the effectiveness and limitations of current charge transfer inefficiency correction methods for space-based CCD detectors, emphasizing the importance of precise parameter knowledge for accurate image correction.
Contribution
It quantifies how parameter uncertainties affect CTI correction performance, providing critical insights for improving in-orbit calibration procedures for Euclid.
Findings
99.68% correction of spurious ellipticity when model matches correction
Readout noise causes over-correction during CTI correction
Parameter knowledge within 0.0272% for trap density and 4% for release time is necessary
Abstract
Radiation damage to space-based Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) detectors creates defects which result in an increasing Charge Transfer Inefficiency (CTI) that causes spurious image trailing. Most of the trailing can be corrected during post-processing, by modelling the charge trapping and moving electrons back to where they belong. However, such correction is not perfect -- and damage is continuing to accumulate in orbit. To aid future development, we quantify the limitations of current approaches, and determine where imperfect knowledge of model parameters most degrade measurements of photometry and morphology. As a concrete application, we simulate "worst case" galaxy and star images to test the performance of the Euclid visual instrument detectors. There are two separable challenges: If the model used to correct CTI is perfectly the same as that used…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
