TL;DR
This paper assesses the imaging quality needed for gravitational lens time delay measurements to effectively constrain cosmological parameters, comparing space and ground-based telescopes and emphasizing the importance of targeted follow-up for fainter systems.
Contribution
It systematically evaluates the imaging requirements for high-precision lens modeling across various current and future telescopes, highlighting the feasibility of follow-up observations with upcoming facilities.
Findings
Survey data suffices for bright lens systems, meeting precision goals.
Follow-up with JWST, Keck AO, and TMT is practical for fainter systems.
Targeted imaging follow-up is essential for optimal cosmological constraints.
Abstract
Lens time delays are a powerful probe of cosmology, provided that the gravitational potential of the main deflector can be modeled with sufficient precision. Recent work has shown that this can be achieved by detailed modeling of the host galaxies of lensed quasars, which appear as "Einstein Rings" in high resolution images. We carry out a systematic exploration of the high resolution imaging required to exploit the thousands of lensed quasars that will be discovered by current and upcoming surveys with the next decade. Specifically, we simulate realistic lens systems as imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), and ground based adaptive optics images taken with Keck or the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT). We compare the performance of these pointed observations with that of images taken by the Euclid (VIS), Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST)…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
