Planck 2015 results. XVI. Isotropy and statistics of the CMB
Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, P. K., Aluri, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, A. J. Banday, R. B., Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, E. Battaner, K. Benabed, A. Beno\^it, A., Benoit-L\'evy, J.-P. Bernard, M. Bersanelli, P. Bielewicz

TL;DR
This paper thoroughly tests the statistical isotropy and Gaussianity of the CMB using Planck 2015 data, confirming consistency with standard cosmological models and identifying large-scale anomalies like the Cold Spot and dipolar asymmetry.
Contribution
It provides the first comprehensive analysis of polarization data and combines multiple statistical tests to assess isotropy and Gaussianity of the CMB with high precision.
Findings
CMB temperature anisotropies are consistent with Gaussianity and isotropy.
Detection of the Cold Spot across multiple analysis methods.
Large-scale dipolar power asymmetry is confirmed with several independent tests.
Abstract
We test the statistical isotropy and Gaussianity of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropies using observations made by the Planck satellite. Our results are based mainly on the full Planck mission for temperature, but also include some polarization measurements. In particular, we consider the CMB anisotropy maps derived from the multi-frequency Planck data by several component-separation methods. For the temperature anisotropies, we find excellent agreement between results based on these sky maps over both a very large fraction of the sky and a broad range of angular scales, establishing that potential foreground residuals do not affect our studies. Tests of skewness, kurtosis, multi-normality, N-point functions, and Minkowski functionals indicate consistency with Gaussianity, while a power deficit at large angular scales is manifested in several ways, for example low map…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
