Evolution of circumbinary planets around eccentric binaries: The case of Kepler-34

TL;DR

This study investigates the formation and evolution of the circumbinary planet Kepler-34 b using hydrodynamical simulations, revealing how binary eccentricity influences planetary migration, orbit alignment, and potential scattering events.

Contribution

It provides new insights into how high-eccentricity binary systems affect circumbinary planet formation and migration, especially through the analysis of Kepler-34's unique orbital characteristics.

Findings

Eccentric binary opens a wide, eccentric inner disk gap.

Planet settles beyond observed orbit but with correct eccentricity.

Two-planet interactions can explain the planet's current position.

Abstract

The existence of planets orbiting a central binary star system immediately raises questions regarding their formation and dynamical evolution. Recent discoveries of circumbinary planets by the Kepler space telescope has shown that some of these planets reside close to the dynamical stability limit where it is very difficult to form planets in situ. For binary systems with nearly circular orbits, such as Kepler-38, the observed proximity of planetary orbits to the stability limit can be understood by an evolutionary process in which planets form farther out in the disk and migrate inward to their observed position. The Kepler-34 system has a high orbital eccentricity of 0.52. Here, we analyse evolutionary scenarios for the planet observed around this system using two-dimensional hydrodynamical simulations. The highly eccentric binary opens a wide inner hole in the disk which is also eccentric, and displays a slow prograde precession. As a result of the large, eccentric inner gap, an embedded planet settles in a final equilibrium position that lies beyond the observed location of Kepler-34 b, but has the correct eccentricity. In this configuration the planetary orbit is aligned with the disk in a state of apsidal corotation.To account for the closer orbit of Kepler-34 b to the central binary, we considered a two-planet scenario and examined the evolution of the system through joint inward migration and capture into mean-motion resonances. When the inner planet orbits inside the gap of the disk, planet-planet scattering ensues. While often one object is thrown into a large, highly eccentric orbit, at times the system is left with a planet close to the observed orbit, suggesting that Kepler 34 might have had two circumbinary planets where one might have been scattered out of the system or into an orbit where it did not transit the central binary during the operation of Kepler.