Two iridates, two models, two approaches: a comparative study on magnetism in 3D honeycomb materials
Eric Kin-Ho Lee, Jeffrey G. Rau, Yong Baek Kim

TL;DR
This study compares different models and methods to understand magnetism in 3D honeycomb iridates, revealing consistent predictions for one compound and method-dependent results for another, with insights from 1D quantum models.
Contribution
It systematically analyzes two models and two approaches across both materials, clarifying their predictive consistency and the role of specific interactions in magnetic ordering.
Findings
The $JK\Gamma$ model predicts the experimental phase of $eta$-Li$_2$IrO$_3$ reliably.
The phase of $\gamma$-Li$_2$IrO$_3$ can be reproduced by soft-spin analysis with eigenmode mixing.
In 1D models, incommensurate correlations survive quantum effects only with symmetric-off-diagonal exchange $\Gamma$.
Abstract
Two recent theoretical works studied the role of Kitaev interactions in the newly observed incommensurate magnetic order in the hyper-honeycomb (-LiIrO) and stripy-honeycomb (-LiIrO) iridates. Each of these works analyzed a different model ( versus coupled zigzag chain model) using a contrasting method (classical versus soft-spin analysis). The lack of commonality between these works precludes meaningful comparisons and a proper understanding of these unusual orderings. In this study, we complete the unfinished picture initiated by these two works by solving both models with both approaches for both 3D honeycomb iridates. Through comparisons between all combinations of models, techniques, and materials, we find that the bond-isotropic model consistently predicts the experimental phase of -LiIrO regardless of the method…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
