Radio faint AGN: a tale of two populations
P. Padovani (1), M. Bonzini (1), K. I. Kellermann (2), N. Miller (3),, V. Mainieri (1), P. Tozzi (4) ((1) ESO, (2) NRAO, Charlottesville, VA, (3), Stevenson University, MD, (4) INAF, Firenze)

TL;DR
This study reveals two distinct populations of faint radio AGN with different evolutionary behaviors, luminosity functions, and Eddington ratios, highlighting the complex nature of the faint radio sky.
Contribution
It provides a detailed analysis of the two AGN populations in the faint radio sky, including their evolution, luminosity functions, and the fraction of radiative-mode radio-loud AGN.
Findings
Radio-quiet AGN evolve as (1+z)^2.5, similar to star-forming galaxies.
Radio-loud AGN number density peaks at z~0.5 and declines at higher redshifts.
Star-forming galaxies dominate the faint radio sky below 0.1 mJy, with radio-quiet AGN overtaking radio-loud ones.
Abstract
We study the Extended Chandra Deep Field South (E-CDFS) Very Large Array sample, which reaches a flux density limit at 1.4 GHz of 32.5 microJy at the field centre and redshift ~ 4, and covers ~ 0.3 deg^2. Number counts are presented for the whole sample while the evolutionary properties and luminosity functions are derived for active galactic nuclei (AGN). The faint radio sky contains two totally distinct AGN populations, characterised by very different evolutions, luminosity functions, and Eddington ratios: radio-quiet (RQ)/radiative-mode, and radio-loud/jet-mode AGN. The radio power of RQ AGN evolves ~ (1+z)^2.5, similarly to star-forming galaxies, while the number density of radio-loud ones has a peak at ~ 0.5 and then declines at higher redshifts. The number density of radio-selected RQ AGN is consistent with that of X-ray selected AGN, which shows that we are sampling the same…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
