Reliability of the one-crossing approximation in describing the Mott transition
V. Vildosola, L. V. Pourovskii, L. O. Manuel, and P. Roura-Bas

TL;DR
This study evaluates the one-crossing approximation's accuracy in modeling the Mott transition within dynamical mean field theory, revealing it captures the transition well but overestimates metallic correlations and shifts the insulator-metal transition.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison between OCA and quantum Monte Carlo methods for the Hubbard model, highlighting the strengths and limitations of OCA in describing the Mott transition.
Findings
OCA accurately predicts the phase diagram and metal-insulator transition point.
OCA overestimates metallic phase correlations and shifts the transition to higher U.
The insulator gap is underestimated due to spectral density moment inaccuracies.
Abstract
We assess the reliability of the one-crossing approximation (OCA) approach in quantitative description of the Mott transition in the framework of the dynamical mean field theory (DMFT). The OCA approach has been applied in the conjunction with DMFT to a number of heavy-fermion, actinide, transition metal compounds, and nanoscale systems. However, several recent studies in the framework of impurity models pointed out to serious deficiencies of OCA and raised questions regarding its reliability. Here we consider a single band Hubbard model on the Bethe lattice at finite temperatures and compare the results of OCA to those of a numerically exact quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) method. The temperature-local repulsion U phase diagram for the particle-hole symmetric case obtained by OCA is in good agreement with that of QMC, with the metal-insulator transition captured very well. We find, however,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
