High-resolution spectroscopic studies of ultra metal-poor stars found in LAMOST survey
Haining Li, Wako Aoki, Gang Zhao, Satoshi Honda, Norbert Christlieb,, and Takuma Suda

TL;DR
This study presents high-resolution spectroscopic analysis of two ultra metal-poor stars from the LAMOST survey, revealing their chemical compositions, classification as CEMP-no stars, and insights into lithium abundance at extremely low metallicity.
Contribution
It provides detailed abundance measurements of two UMP stars, including a newly discovered one, and discusses implications for stellar populations and lithium depletion at very low metallicity.
Findings
Both stars are CEMP-no with normal low-metallicity abundance patterns.
The lithium abundance in the new UMP star supports the 'meltdown' of the Spite plateau.
Differences in light elements may influence lithium variations among CEMP-no stars.
Abstract
We report on the observations of two ultra metal-poor (UMP) stars with [Fe/H]~-4.0 including one new discovery. The two stars are studied in the on-going and quite efficient project to search for extremely metal-poor (EMP) stars with LAMOST and Subaru. Detailed abundances or upper limits of abundances have been derived for 15 elements from Li to Eu based on high-resolution spectra obtained with Subaru/HDS. The abundance patterns of both UMP stars are consistent with the "normal-population" among the low-metallicity stars. Both of the two program stars show carbon-enhancement without any excess of heavy neutron-capture elements, indicating that they belong to the subclass of CEMP-no stars, as is the case of most UMP stars previously studied. The [Sr/Ba] ratios of both CEMP-no UMP stars are above [Sr/Ba]~-0.4, suggesting the origin of the carbon-excess is not compatible with the mass…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
