Complexity of Manipulative Actions When Voting with Ties
Zack Fitzsimmons, Edith Hemaspaandra

TL;DR
This paper investigates how allowing voters to have ties in their preferences affects the computational complexity of manipulation, bribery, and control in election systems, revealing both increases and decreases in complexity.
Contribution
It extends the analysis of election problems to include voters with ties, providing new complexity results and a general understanding of their impact on election manipulation.
Findings
Allowing ties can both increase and decrease manipulation complexity.
Extended the definitions of election systems to handle voters with ties.
Provided a general result on the effect of ties on control complexity.
Abstract
Most of the computational study of election problems has assumed that each voter's preferences are, or should be extended to, a total order. However in practice voters may have preferences with ties. We study the complexity of manipulative actions on elections where voters can have ties, extending the definitions of the election systems (when necessary) to handle voters with ties. We show that for natural election systems allowing ties can both increase and decrease the complexity of manipulation and bribery, and we state a general result on the effect of voters with ties on the complexity of control.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Game Theory and Applications · Auction Theory and Applications
