Comparing quasiparticle H$_2$O level alignment on anatase and rutile TiO$_2$

TL;DR

This study uses advanced quasiparticle calculations to compare water level alignment on anatase and rutile TiO₂ surfaces, revealing why anatase exhibits higher photocatalytic activity due to more favorable HOMO level alignment and hole trapping.

Contribution

It provides a detailed quasiparticle level alignment analysis of water on TiO₂ surfaces, explaining differences in photocatalytic activity between anatase and rutile phases.

Findings

Anatase TiO₂(101) shows more favorable HOMO alignment than rutile TiO₂(110).

Hole trapping is more likely on anatase TiO₂(101).

HO@Ti_cus is more photocatalytically active than intact H₂O@Ti_cus.

Abstract

Knowledge of the molecular frontier levels' alignment in the ground state can be used to predict the photocatalytic activity of an interface. The position of the adsorbate's highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) levels relative to the substrate's valence band maximum (VBM) in the interface describes the favorability of photogenerated hole transfer from the VBM to the adsorbed molecule. This is a key quantity for assessing and comparing H$_2$O photooxidation activities on two prototypical photocatalytic TiO$_2$ surfaces: anatase (A)-TiO$_2$(101) and rutile (R)-TiO$_2$(110). Using the projected density of states (DOS) from state-of-the-art quasiparticle (QP) $G_0W_0$ calculations, we assess the relative photocatalytic activity of intact and dissociated H$_2$O on coordinately unsaturated (Ti$_{\textit{cus}}$) sites of idealized stoichiometric A-TiO$_2$(101)/R-TiO$_2$(110) and bridging O vacancies (O$_{\textit{br}}^{\textit{vac}}$) of defective A-TiO$_{2-x}$(101)/R-TiO$_{2-x}$(110) surfaces ($x=\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{8}$) for various coverages. Such a many-body treatment is necessary to correctly describe the anisotropic screening of electron-electron interactions at a photocatalytic interface, and hence obtain accurate interfacial level alignments. The more favorable ground state HOMO level alignment for A-TiO$_2$(101) may explain why the anatase polymorph shows higher photocatalytic activities than the rutile polymorph. Our results indicate that (1) hole trapping is more favored on A-TiO$_2$(101) than R-TiO$_2$(110) and (2) HO@Ti$_{\textit{cus}}$ is more photocatalytically active than intact H$_2$O@Ti$_{\textit{cus}}$.