Collisional modelling of the AU Microscopii debris disc
Ch. Sch\"uppler, T. L\"ohne, A. V. Krivov, S. Ertel, J. P. Marshall,, S. Wolf, M. C. Wyatt, J.-C. Augereau, S. A. Metchev

TL;DR
This study uses detailed collisional models to understand the dust production and dynamics of the AU Microscopii debris disc, successfully reproducing many observational features and providing insights into the disc's structure and dust properties.
Contribution
It presents a comprehensive collisional model of the AU Mic debris disc, incorporating stellar forces and comparing results with diverse observational data, highlighting the disc's structure and dust characteristics.
Findings
Most data fit a planetesimal belt with an outer edge at ~40au.
A low eccentricity (up to 0.03) for planetesimals is preferred.
Best model suggests a stellar mass loss rate 50 times solar.
Abstract
The spatially resolved AU Mic debris disc is among the most famous and best-studied debris discs. We aim at a comprehensive understanding of the dust production and the dynamics of the disc objects with in depth collisional modelling including stellar radiative and corpuscular forces. Our models are compared to a suite of observational data for thermal and scattered light emission, ranging from the ALMA radial surface brightness profile at 1.3mm to polarisation measurements in the visible. Most of the data can be reproduced with a planetesimal belt having an outer edge at around 40au and subsequent inward transport of dust by stellar winds. A low dynamical excitation of the planetesimals with eccentricities up to 0.03 is preferred. The radial width of the planetesimal belt cannot be constrained tightly. Belts that are 5au and 17au wide, as well as a broad 44au-wide belt are consistent…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
