No Regularity Singularities Exist at Points of General Relativistic Shock Wave Interaction between Shocks from Different Characteristic Families
Moritz Reintjes, Blake Temple

TL;DR
This paper proves that in spherically symmetric spacetimes, coordinate transformations can smooth the gravitational metric at shock wave collision points from Lipschitz continuous to twice differentiable, showing regularity singularities do not exist in this context.
Contribution
It provides a constructive proof that regularity singularities are absent at shock interactions from different characteristic families, extending Israel's work with a new proof strategy.
Findings
Coordinate transformations raise metric regularity from C^{0,1} to C^{1,1} near shock interactions.
Regularity singularities do not exist at shock wave interactions in spherically symmetric spacetimes.
The proof corrects previous misconceptions about the non-existence of such smooth transformations.
Abstract
We give a constructive proof that coordinate transformations exist which raise the regularity of the gravitational metric tensor from to in a neighborhood of points of shock wave collision in General Relativity. The proof applies to collisions between shock waves coming from different characteristic families, in spherically symmetric spacetimes. Our result here implies that spacetime is locally inertial and corrects an error in our earlier RSPA-publication, which led us to the false conclusion that such coordinate transformations, which smooth the metric to , cannot exist. Thus, our result implies that regularity singularities, (a type of mild singularity introduced in our RSPA-paper), do not exist at points of interacting shock waves from different families in spherically symmetric spacetimes. Our result generalizes Israel's celebrated 1966 paper to the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
